Praxair Distribution, Inc. v. Mallinckrodt Hosp. Prods. Ip Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion filed by Circuit Judge Newman, concurring in the judgment.
Lourie, Circuit Judge.
*1028 Praxair Distribution, Inc. ("Praxair") appeals from the inter partes review decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("the Board") holding claim 9 of U.S. Patent 8,846,112 (the "'112 patent") not unpatentable as obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103 (2006). 1 Praxair Distrib., Inc. v. Mallinckrodt Hosp. Prods. IP Ltd. , No. IPR2015-00529, 2016 WL 3648375 (P.T.A.B. July 7, 2016) (" Decision "). Mallinckrodt Hospital Products IP Ltd. ("Mallinckrodt") cross-appeals from…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- C R Bard Inc. v. Angiodynamics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Game and Technology Co., Ltd. v. Wargaming Group LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- In Re: Marco Guldenaar Holding B.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Arista Networks, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- C R Bard Inc. v. AngioDynamics Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2019
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.