Legal Opinion

State v. Kent

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided August 17, 2006No. 25,483PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUTIN, Judge.

{1} Defendant Valerie Kent appeals her conviction of the crime of accessory to attempt to manufacture methamphetamine on the grounds of insufficient evidence and error in denying admission of a photograph. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

{2} The State presented three law enforcement witnesses. One or more of the officers witnessed a person they identified as Defendant purchase ten boxes of matches at a convenience store. Knowing that the striker plates on the matchboxes consist of red phosphorous, a key ingredient for the manufacture of methamphetamine, the officers followed…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. SutphinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. WoodwardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. DavisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. HernandezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State v. CaldwellNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. State v. LopezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. State v. QuiñonesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. State v. QuinonesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. State v. CorreaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API