State v. Kent
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
{1} Defendant Valerie Kent appeals her conviction of the crime of accessory to attempt to manufacture methamphetamine on the grounds of insufficient evidence and error in denying admission of a photograph. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
{2} The State presented three law enforcement witnesses. One or more of the officers witnessed a person they identified as Defendant purchase ten boxes of matches at a convenience store. Knowing that the striker plates on the matchboxes consist of red phosphorous, a key ingredient for the manufacture of methamphetamine, the officers followed…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. SutphinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. WoodwardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. DavisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. HernandezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- State v. CaldwellNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. LopezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. QuiñonesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. QuinonesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. CorreaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.