Legal Opinion

Will v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 26, 1995No. 93-36157PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

This case involves a claim by a logging contractor against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. § 2671 et seq., for property damage sustained by his road grader while it was parked in a national forest.

FACTS

During the summer of 1989, a timber sale and a ponderosa pine tree study required logging in the same area of the Colville National Forest in Washington state. The Forest Service had sold timber to a sawmill. The sawmill had contracted with Garry Will to cut and remove that timber. The Forest Service had selected and marked ponderosa pine trees to be…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Jeanette Jesinger v. Nevada Federal Credit Union, a Federally-Chartered Credit Union Robert W. FleischmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. Logue v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Potts v. AmisWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Thomas v. Wilfac, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Autery v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. Darrow Kierov Erlin, and Barbara Snow-Erlin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Glass v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2008
  4. Monroe v. U.S. MarshalsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. Panion v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API