Albright v. Moeckly
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtMoRLING, J.
A former appeal of this case is reported in In re Estate of Sexauer, 198 Iowa 1378.
I. The only question in connection with the claim of undue influence that need be noticed is the ruling of the court sustaining-proponent’s objection to contestants’ offer to prove conversations between one of the beneficiaries (Jacob) and others, after the execution of the will, in which he admitted that it was through his im-portunities and because of his need that the will was made. By the will, after the making of certain bequests, the residue was required to be divided into seven and one-half shares. One…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re Will of RichardsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
- Bales v. BalesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
- James v. FairallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- In Re Will of JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- Liddle v. SalterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Walters v. HeatonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
- Wackman v. WiegoldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927