United States v. Five Gambling Devices
District Court, E.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
PLATT, Chief Judge.
The United States, libelant in this-, libel action, seeks to condemn and have-forfeited five machines as “gambling device [s]” which were allegedly transported in interstate commerce in violation of the Johnson Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1172.
The respondents stipulated that the machines in controversy were transported in interstate commerce. The only remaining question presented by the briefs of both libelant and respondents, is the issue as to whether the machines are “gambling device [s]” within the *562meaning of Title 15, § 1171, U.S.C. which reads as follows:
“(a) The term…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. Robert J. Ansani, Harvey Milner, John Edward Moore, Joseph J. Aiuppa and Ray JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
- Washington Coin MacH. Ass'n v. CallahanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
- United States v. Walter KorpanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
- United States v. AnsaniDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Five Gambling DevicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
- United States v. Five Gambling DevicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958