Legal Opinion
United States v. Ochs
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 7, 1978No. 77 Cr. 775PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
IRVING BEN COOPER, District Judge.
The defendant moves pursuant to Rules 41(f) and 12(b), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, to suppress the contents of two briefcases seized and searched on September 5, 1975 by the New York City Police. After a full hearing before us on December 13 and 20, 1977, the within motion is hereby denied in its entirety.
Our ruling is predicated primarily on the following succinct recital: (1) The defendant has standing to contest the admissibility of the seized articles on the basis of Fourth Amendment safeguards. See, e. g., Mancusi v. DeForte, 392 U.S.…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. George OchsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- People v. AbramsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- People v. GriffinNew York Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. Dolson, New York County Courts1989
- United States v. OchsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.