Legal Opinion

Inhabitants of Stoughton v. Baker

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 15, 1808PublishedCited by 52 opinions

This was a special action of the case, in which the plaintiffs declare that on the 15th day of March, 1805, the legislature of this commonwealth appointed N. Tillinghast, E. Loud, and E. Turner, Esquires, a committee, after giving due notice to the parties, to repair to the several darns on Neponset River, between the sea and Paul’s bridge on said river, and to order such alterations to be made in the fishways through the several dams aforesaid, or to cause such new fishways…

Read the full summary

This was a special action of the case, in which the plaintiffs declare that on the 15th day of March, 1805, the legislature of this commonwealth appointed N. Tillinghast, E. Loud, and E. Turner, Esquires, a committee, after giving due notice to the parties, to repair to the several darns on Neponset River, between the sea and Paul’s bridge on said river, and to order such alterations to be made in the fishways through the several dams aforesaid, or to cause such new fishways to be made around said dams, or either of them, as in their opinion, or the major part of them, should be sufficient…

1Opinion of the Court

The action stood continued nisi, and at the March term in Suffolk, the opinion of the Court was delivered by

Parsons, C. J.

The plaintiffs found their claim on the resolution of the legislature recited in the declaration; on the alteration of the former sluice-way ordered by the committee therein appoint ed ; on the refusal of the defendants to make that alteration seasonably ; on the authority given by Mr. Loud, as a sub-committee, to the plaintiffs, to make that alteration; and on the plaintiffs’ making :"t pursuant to that authority.

The defendants object to the claim of reimbursement of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Emerson v. Providence Hat Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815
  2. Kupfer v. Inhabitants of the South Parish in AugustaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. City of MethuenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  2. Commissioners on Inland Fisheries v. Holyoke Water Power Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  3. Gloucester Water Supply Co. v. City of GloucesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  4. Brown v. City of NewburyportMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  5. Levasser v. WashburnSupreme Court of Virginia · 1854

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API