People v. Lanham
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TIMLIN, Acting P. J.
Defendant was convicted by jury on both counts of an amended information. Count 1 alleged that on March 7, 1989, he violated Penal Code section 12021, subdivision (a) 1 by being a person convicted of a felony and having in his possession a firearm. Count 2 alleged that on March 7, 1989, defendant violated section 12020, subdivision (a) by being in possession of a bullet which carries or contains an explosive agent. After pronouncement of judgment, defendant was sentenced as follows: Count 1—upper term of three years and count 2—midterm of two years to run.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. WinstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. HernandezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- People v. RedrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- People v. GoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- People v. ProchnauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. Jorge M.California Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. TelferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- People v. Jorge M.California Supreme Court · 2000