Legal Opinion

People v. Lanham

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 3, 1991No. E007427PublishedCited by 4 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TIMLIN, Acting P. J.

Defendant was convicted by jury on both counts of an amended information. Count 1 alleged that on March 7, 1989, he violated Penal Code section 12021, subdivision (a) 1 by being a person convicted of a felony and having in his possession a firearm. Count 2 alleged that on March 7, 1989, defendant violated section 12020, subdivision (a) by being in possession of a bullet which carries or contains an explosive agent. After pronouncement of judgment, defendant was sentenced as follows: Count 1—upper term of three years and count 2—midterm of two years to run.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. WinstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. HernandezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. People v. RedrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. People v. GoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. People v. ProchnauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. Jorge M.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. People v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. People v. TelferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. People v. Jorge M.California Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API