Legal Opinion

United States v. White

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided November 27, 2002No. CR. 88-50066PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION “TO CORRECT ILLEGAL SENTENCES”

GADOLA, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendants filed a motion “to correct illegal sentences” on August 2, 2002 based on Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and on the Court’s inherent authority to correct an illegal sentence. Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Wallace Capel, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge, on this motion. The Magistrate Judge recommends that this Court deny Defendants’ motion on procedural and substantive…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  3. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Bifulco v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Donald and Ronald HILL, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. the DURIRON COMPANY, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. SquareDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2011
  2. Li v. Revere Local Schools Board of EducationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API