Legal Opinion
Howard Moniz v. Michael Cox
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 22, 2013No. 11-1790UnpublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant Howard Moniz (“Moniz”), a Michigan prisoner, alleges in this civil-rights suit that Michigan’s former attorney general, Michael Cox (“Cox”), violated Moniz’s rights by failing to investigate or otherwise remedy a purportedly corrupt and discriminatory towing policy carried out by a private towing company in Monroe County, Michigan. Moniz asserts that Cox and those he supervises lied in federal court about the asserted towing scam and that Cox failed to correct or prevent misconduct by local prosecutors. The district court summarily…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- BBF Engineering Services, PC v. State of Mich.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Todd Courser v. Keith AllardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Ali El-Hallani v. Huntington National BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Uduko v. CozzensDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013
- Deja Vu Of Nashville v. Metropolitan GovernmentDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2019
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.