Legal Opinion
Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd. v. Bombardier Recreational Products, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 21, 2011No. 11-2120PublishedCited by 117 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs-appellees, Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd. and Motors Manufacturing Corp., U.S.A. (together “Kawasaki”), filed several claims against appellants Bombardier Recreational Products, Inc. and BRP U.S., Inc. (together “BRP”). Kawasaki also filed claims against BRP’s attorneys and Bank of Montreal, a secured lender of BRP. The claims all arise from a settlement agreement between Kawasaki and BRP, and that agreement contains an arbitration clause. Pursuant to the arbitration clause, BRP filed a motion to dismiss or stay all of Kawasaki’s claims pending…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Vaden v. Discover BankSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Kowalski v. TesmerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by117 opinions
- Scheurer v. Fromm Family Foods LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Bellevue Drug Co. v. CaremarksPCSCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Smith v. GC Servs. Ltd. P'shipCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Brickstructures, Inc. v. Coaster Dynamix, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Hoenig v. Karl Knauz Motors, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.