Legal Opinion

Hoenig v. Karl Knauz Motors, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 16, 2013No. 13 C 0866PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

RUBEN CASTILLO, Chief Judge United States District Court

Shanda Hoenig (“Hoenig”) brings this action against her former employer, Karl Knauz Motors, Incorporated (“Knauz”) alleging violations of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., as amended by the Civil Rights Act of 1991 (“Titlé VII”); the Equal Pay Act of 1963, 29 U.S.C. §§ 206, 207; the Illinois Equal Pay Act, 820 111. Comp. Stat. 112/1 et seq.; and the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq., as well as unlawful retaliation in violation of each statute. Presently…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Paragon Micro, Inc. v. BundyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
  2. Davis v. FentonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
  3. 20/20 Foresight, Inc. v. McGuffinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
  4. 4 Zone 180 LLC, et al. v. Charles Jones, et al.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2026
  5. BIOCONVERGENCE LLC v. ATTARIWALADistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2021

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API