Legal Opinion

Gilland v. Hyder

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided May 3, 1967No. Civ. No. 2095PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*190MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDERS

NEESE, District Judge.

■ The plaintiff, having made affidavit that he is unable to prepay the fees and costs herein or give security therefor, having attached same to a document which may be construed as a complaint which states the nature of this action, and having stated his belief that he is entitled to redress, the plaintiff hereby is authorized to commence and prosecute this action without the prepayment of fees or costs or giving security therefor. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)

The plaintiff, a prisoner in a Tennessee state penitentiary, seeks damages from the Honorable…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Ralph K. Forsythe v. State of OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jerome MacLin v. Dr. FreakeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
  2. Willett v. WellsDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1977
  3. Drexler v. WaltersDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1968
  4. Hanson v. GoodwinDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1977
  5. Sherrod v. Piedmont Aviation, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API