Legal Opinion

Buckley & Company, Inc. v. Secretary of Labor

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 3, 1975No. 74-1358PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.

This petition for review of an order of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission requires us to decide if notice mailed to a superintendent of a garage and maintenance shop of a large construction company is proper notification to the corporate employer under § 10(a) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, 29 U.S.C. § 659(a). A divided Commission held that the notification to the superintendent satisfied the requirements of the Act. We disagree and set aside the order of the Commission.

The genesis of the citations and notices…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Washington Cedar & Supply Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  2. Washington Cedar & Supply Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  3. Corporate Training Unlimited, Inc. v. National Broadcasting Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1994
  4. Capital City Excavating Co., Inc. v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, and Occupational Safety and Health Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  5. House of Raeford Farms, Inc. v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API