Legal Opinion

Love v. Nashville Agricultural & Normal Institute

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided May 14, 1927PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrownover, J.

The bill in this cause was filed on October 27, 1919, enjoining the defendants from maintaining a nuisance in conducting the sewage from its school and sanitarium into a drain in such a way as to contaminate complainant’s sulphur spring located upon his premises adjoining those of the defendants, and to recover damages for the loss of sales of the water, and for the depreciation in value to complainant’s property.

The defendants answered and denied all liability, and insisted that the spring was not contaminated by said sewer, but that it was contaminated from other sources, and pleaded that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Swain v. Tennessee Copper Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  2. City of Bristol v. BostwickTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Louisville & Nashville Terminal Co. v. LellyettTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Love v. Nashville Agricultural & Normal InstituteTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Going v. GoingTennessee Supreme Court · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Columbia v. LentzCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1955
  2. City of Murfreesboro v. HaynesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1935
  3. Reed Bros. Stone Co., Inc. v. Pittman Const. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1936
  4. Falls v. CarruthersCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1936
  5. Southern Ry. Co. v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API