Legal Opinion

Maxey Son v. Tinsley

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cook

This appeal involves the claim of plaintiff in error, Tinsley, to the proceeds of exempt chattels voluntarily sold. The cause originated before a justice of the peace and was carried to the circuit court, and, from an adverse judgment in that court, Tinsley appealed and has assigned errors.

It is insisted that the proceeds from the sale of hogs were exempt under section 7701 of the Code as well as under section 7708. The trial judge held the debt subject to execution. It is assumed from statements in the briefs that he grounded his judgment upon the proposition (1) that Tinsley waived his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cullen v. HarrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Blackford v. BoakOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Weskalnies v. HestermanIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Wylie v. GrundysenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  5. Parsons v. EvansSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gillett State Bank v. KnaackWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Gutterman v. First National Bank of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API