Legal Opinion
City of Austin v. Phipps
Texas Supreme Court
Decided March 15, 1961No. A-8023PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Steakley
Respondent, William C. Phipps, sued Petitioner, City of Austin, for a judgment declaring and establishing his rights to an injury leave of absence under the provisions of Section 26 of Article 1269m, Vernon’s Annotated Civil Statutes. Section 26, as relevant here, reads as follows:
“Provided that all such cities coming under the provisions of this Act shall provide injury leaves of absence with full pay for periods of time commensurate with the nature of injuries received while in line of duty for at least one (1) year. At the expiration of said one-year period, the City Council or governing…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- City of Waco v. LandinghamTexas Supreme Court · 1941
- City of San Antonio v. StaufferCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
- City of Austin v. PhippsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
3Cited by8 opinions
- Breaux v. City of GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- H. B. Zachry Co. v. Ceco Steel Products Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- City of Waco, TX v. Bittle, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
- Perez v. City of Laredo, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2000
- CITY OF HOUSTON FIRE FIGHTERS' v. Morris, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.