In re Loose
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
J. F. T. O’CONNOR, District Judge.
This is a review of an order determining commencement of a three year stay order period, by the conciliation commissioner, pursuant to section 75 sub. s (1, 2), of the Bankruptcy Act.
On July 2, 1937, the debtor, Harold H. Loose, duly executed and delivered to E. A. Henderson and Mattie Henderson, his wife, a certain promissory note in the amount of $10,000 secured by a deed of trust on certain real property' consisting of a ten acre citrus grove, owned by Mr. Loose. The debtor defaulted on his obligation and in the interim of July 2, 1937, to October 11,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wright v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. BartelsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Borchard v. California BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Wright v. LoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- In re J. & M. Doyle Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re Glenn-Colusa Irr. Dist.District Court, N.D. California · 1945