Legal Opinion

In re Loose

District Court, S.D. California

Decided September 28, 1943No. 34590PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

J. F. T. O’CONNOR, District Judge.

This is a review of an order determining commencement of a three year stay order period, by the conciliation commissioner, pursuant to section 75 sub. s (1, 2), of the Bankruptcy Act.

On July 2, 1937, the debtor, Harold H. Loose, duly executed and delivered to E. A. Henderson and Mattie Henderson, his wife, a certain promissory note in the amount of $10,000 secured by a deed of trust on certain real property' consisting of a ten acre citrus grove, owned by Mr. Loose. The debtor defaulted on his obligation and in the interim of July 2, 1937, to October 11,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wright v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. BartelsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Borchard v. California BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Wright v. LoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. In re J. & M. Doyle Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Glenn-Colusa Irr. Dist.District Court, N.D. California · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API