Legal Opinion · Dissent

Coffey’s Case

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 18, 2008No. JD-2007-003Published

1DissentGalway, J.

I agree with the majority’s conclusion that Judge Coffey engaged in serious misconduct. I also agree with the majority that Judge Coffey was complicit in an intentionally fraudulent transfer because she took valuable property and aided her husband in shielding it from creditors, including the PCC, an arm of this court, and that she ignored and interfered with the commands of a valid supreme court order, thereby *192adversely affecting the administration of justice. I further agree with the majority that the purpose of the intentionally fraudulent transfer and disregard of this court’s order…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re GrazianoSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  2. In Re RenkeSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  3. In Re MussmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
  4. Matter of CollazoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Budnitz' CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API