Legal Opinion

City of Philadelphia v. Steen Outdoor Advertising

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 18, 2007PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge LEAVITT.

Steen Outdoor Advertising (Steen) appeals several orders issued by the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County (trial court) in the course of a proceeding initiated by the City of Philadelphia with respect to a sign erected and maintained by Steen. The principal issue we consider is whether a double-faced, free-standing sign, with a face measuring 14 feet by 48 feet, that stands 50 feet off the ground, is an outdoor advertising sign or an accessory sign.

This case presents a complex procedural history. In June 1998, the City’s Department of Licenses and Inspections…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hess v. Gebhard & Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Frog, Switch & Manufacturing Co. v. Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Commonwealth v. WhitefordCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Com. v. Robinson, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API