Legal Opinion

Amanda Kaye Bachman v. Judge Cameron M. Beech

District Court, D. Utah

Decided January 5, 2026No. 2:25-cv-00739Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION AMANDA KAYE BACHMAN, MEMORANDUM DECISION Plaintiff, AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v. Case No. 2:25-cv-00739-TC JUDGE CAMERON M. BEECH, Judge Tena Campbell Defendant. Plaintiff Amanda Kaye Bachman, who represents herself and was (at the time the Complaint in this action was filed on August 29, 2025) a pre-sentencing detainee, brings this civil rights action under

42 U.S.C. § 1983.1

The court screens the Complaint (ECF No. 1) under the court’s statutory review function. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A.2 1 The federal statute creating…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API