Legal Opinion
Eastman Chemical Co. v. Niro, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided January 24, 2000No. CIV. A. G-99-623PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM
KENT, District Judge.
Eastman purchased a spray fluidizer dryer from Niro, intending to use the dryer in an attempt to increase its potassium sórbate production capability. Eastman alleges that the dryer failed to perform according to contract specifications, and has brought suit against Niro alleging breach of contract, breach of warranty, fraudulent inducement, fraud subsequent to the formation of contract, and negligent misrepresentation. Eastman seeks the customary damages, including…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Formosa Plastics Corp. USA v. Presidio Engineers and Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- Duncan v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
- Manuel M. Fernandez-Montes v. Allied Pilots Association, Fred Vogel, and C.R. PatyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re General Motors LLC Ignition Switch LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Lake v. CravensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Pine Telephone Co. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Nestlé Purina Petcare Co. v. Blue Buffalo Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2015
- Fagan Holdings, Inc. v. Thinkware, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.