Coniglio v. Hansl
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHastings, J.
Plaintiffs brought this action under Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 25-21,149 et seq. (Reissue 1979), seeking a declaration of the rights and liabilities of the various parties under a certain written contract containing either an option to purchase or a first refusal option, executed sometime during the month of June 1977. Specifically, the plaintiffs sought a declaration that they had no liability to the defendants under the agreement, whereas the defendants counterclaimed, seeking specific performance of what they insist was an option to purchase certain property. We affirm the judgment in favor of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Associated Truck Lines, Inc. v. BaerMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Tedco Development Corp. v. Overland Hills, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1978
- Tantum v. KellerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
- Lancaster Malleable Castings Co. v. DunieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Tantum v. KellerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pluhacek v. Nebraska Lutheran Outdoor Ministries, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988