Legal Opinion

Sackett v. ITC^ DELTACOM, INC.

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided June 24, 2005No. 1:03-cr-00159PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

COLLIER, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

In Kolstad v. American Dental Association, 527 U.S. 526, 119 S.Ct. 2118, 144 L.Ed.2d 494 (1999) the Supreme Court for the first time considered the language providing for punitive damages in the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. § 1981a, and provided its construction of that language. In this Title VII lawsuit the Court is now required to apply the holding of Kolstad to the particular facts before the Court. In so doing, the Court of necessity must sift through the text of the Kolstad opinion, consider the purposes espoused in the decision,…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Kolstad v. American Dental Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Amanda West v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API