Sackett v. ITC^ DELTACOM, INC.
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
COLLIER, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
In Kolstad v. American Dental Association, 527 U.S. 526, 119 S.Ct. 2118, 144 L.Ed.2d 494 (1999) the Supreme Court for the first time considered the language providing for punitive damages in the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. § 1981a, and provided its construction of that language. In this Title VII lawsuit the Court is now required to apply the holding of Kolstad to the particular facts before the Court. In so doing, the Court of necessity must sift through the text of the Kolstad opinion, consider the purposes espoused in the decision,…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kolstad v. American Dental Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Amanda West v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010