Legal Opinion

Claim of Moskowitz v. Granata

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 10, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The Workmen’s Compensation Board has found that claimant, a taxi driver, was an employee of appellant Granata at the time of his injury November 30, 1952. Appel*311lants argue on appeal that this finding is not supported by substantial evidence.

The proof is that appellant employer owned one taxicab which he entrusted to Charles Muller, an owner of other taxicabs, to operate for him. This arrangement was made on appellant’s behalf by an agent (appellant’s lawyer and insurance broker) who was interested in keeping the cab in operation so as to preserve the hack license.

Appellant employer never…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Claim of Kwapich v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  2. Claim of Klein v. Louis Candel Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mitchell v. Ed HizerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API