Legal Opinion

Rush v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 11, 2008No. 31, Sept. Term, 2007Published

1Opinion of the Court

939 A.2d 689 (2008)

403 Md. 68

Cindi Renee Katherine RUSH

v.

STATE of Maryland.

No. 31, Sept. Term, 2007.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

January 11, 2008.

David A. Martella (Barry H. Hefland, Rockville), on brief, for petitioner/cross-respondent.

Diane E. Keller, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Douglas F. Gansler, Atty. Gen.), on brief, for respondent/cross-petitioner.

Argued before BELL, C.J., RAKER, HARRELL, BATTAGLIA, GREENE, ALAN M. WILNER, (Retired, specially assigned) DALE R. CATHELL, (Retired, specially assigned), JJ.

BATTAGLIA, J.

The case sub judice presents this Court with the issue of whether a police…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Raker; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Raker.

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Missouri v. SeibertSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Duckworth v. EaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Crooker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API