Legal Opinion

Hansen v. Abrasive Engineering & Manufacturing, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 21, 1992No. 87-CV-0302-TM; CA A61214Published

1Opinion of the Court

831 P.2d 693 (1992)

112 Or. App. 586

Timothy R. HANSEN, Appellant,

v.

ABRASIVE ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING, INC., a foreign corporation, Respondent, and

Akhurst Machinery, Inc., an Oregon corporation, Defendant.

87-CV-0302-TM; CA A61214.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted June 17, 1991.

Decided April 22, 1992.

Reconsideration Denied May 27, 1992.

Review Allowed July 21, 1992.

Donald A. Bick, Eugene, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Bick & Monte, P.C., Eugene.

William E. Flinn, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were John R. Osborn and…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bellikka v. GreenOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Shahtout v. Emco Garbage Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Dunlap v. DicksonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Flores v. Metro MacHinery Rigging, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  5. Lepire v. Motor Vehicles DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API