Goldstein v. Sommervell
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNoonan, J.
The plaintiffs, who are employees.of the Works Progress Administration, seek a temporary injunction against the defendant, individually and as administrator of the Works Progress Administration for the City of New York, from interfering with, demoting,' transferring or dismissing the plaintiffs from their employment, and also request the return of all fingerprints heretofore taken of every employee of the Works Progress *603Administration for the City of New York engaged in the elementary school, adult education field activity and recreation projects. The plaintiffs, all of whom are employed on…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. OwlettDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1936
- Manufacturers Trust Co. v. RossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
3Cited by4 opinions
- Shanks Village Committee Against Rent Increases v. CaryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Long v. SomervellNew York Supreme Court · 1940
- State Board of Health v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
- Carver v. HaynesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1941