Legal Opinion

Computer Acceleration Corp. v. Microsoft Corp.

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided May 7, 2007No. 4:06-cv-00140Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER CONSTRUING CLAIM TERMS OF UNITED STATES PATENT NO. 5,933,630

RON CLARK, District Judge.

Plaintiff Computer Acceleration Corporation (“CAC”) filed suit against Defendant Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”) claiming infringement of United States Patent No. 5,933,630 (“the '630 patent”). The court conducted a Markman hearing to assist the court in interpreting the meaning of the claim terms in dispute., Having carefully considered the patent, the prosecution history, the parties’ briefs, and the arguments of counsel, the court now makes the following findings and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  3. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  4. Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  5. Teleflex, Inc. v. Ficosa North America Corp., Fico Cables, S.A., and Ficosa North America S.A. De C.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API