Legal Opinion

Garboden v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided April 19, 1966No. Civ. No. 63-63PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

KILKENNY, District Judge:

Here, for review is the final decision of the defendant under § 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

The issue is whether the decision of the Secretary, holding that plaintiff failed to show that he was unable to engage in a substantial gainful activity by reason of his alleged impairment, is supported by substantial evidence. The Act places the burden of proving such disability on the plaintiff. Graham v. Ribicoff, 295 F.2d 391 (9th Cir. 1961); Mark v. Celebrezze, 348 F.2d 289 (9th Cir. 1965).

Plaintiff, in March, 1955, at the age of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare v. Herbert E. BolasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
  2. Andrew C. Mark v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  3. Rosie L. Page v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  4. Willie Graham v. Abraham A. Ribicoff, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  5. Armando G. Galli v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Calpin v. FinchDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Harvey v. FinchDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1970
  3. Emmette v. RichardsonDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1971
  4. Johnson v. GardnerDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1968
  5. Kroeneke v. RichardsonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API