Legal Opinion

Heffelfinger v. Appleton

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 28, 1919No. Nos. 21,331, 21,332PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The executors of the estate of Frank H. Peavey, deceased, petitioned the probate court for Hennepin county for an order making partial distribution of the residuary estate and for the construction of item 36 of testator’s will. The petition was heard by Dahl, J., who made findings and as conclusion of law ordered distribution of certain moneys to the beneficiaries.

Read the full summary

The executors of the estate of Frank H. Peavey, deceased, petitioned the probate court for Hennepin county for an order making partial distribution of the residuary estate and for the construction of item 36 of testator’s will. The petition was heard by Dahl, J., who made findings and as conclusion of law ordered distribution of certain moneys to the beneficiaries. From the order of the probate court construing item 36 of the will, Katherine Jordan Peavey Appleton appealed to the district court for that county. The appeal was heard by Rockwood, J., who reversed the decree of the probate court…

1Opinion of the CourtHallam, J.

1. Frank H. Peavey died testate December 30, 1901. He left two daughters and one son. The elder daughter was married to Frank T. Heffelfinger. They then had three children and now have four. The younger daughter was married to Frederick B. Wells. They then had one child and now have four. The son was married to appellant. He died childless in 1913. Appellant has since remarried. Mr. Peavey was 'engaged principally in the grain and elevator business and was possessed of large wealth. In his will he gave some specific legacies. He created many trusts, in each case directing the deposit of money…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Fowler v. DuhmeIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Britton v. ThorntonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Union Mutual Ass'n v. MontgomeryMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Fiske v. LawtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  5. Culver v. HardenberghSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad v. St. Paul Mercury-Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  2. In re the Trusteeship under the Last Will & Testament of BellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  3. Levings v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  4. First National Bank v. KirschmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  5. In Re the Estate of ZagarCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API