Legal Opinion

Rosser v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 20, 1971No. 5560Published

1Opinion of the Court

PAIR, Associate Judge:

This appeal challenges an order of the court below granting summary judgment in an action to recover from a stock broker certain shares of stock or their value.

Appellant is and was, at the time she filed her complaint, a citizen of the State of California. Appellee is a stock broker conducting, in the District of Columbia and in various states, including the States of California and Oregon, a stock brokerage business.

The facts are not in dispute. Commencing sometime in 1959 appellant and *235one Horace R. Skinner, to whom she was then married, maintained with appellee, at…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Durfee v. DukeSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Alton v. AltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Eleanor Holm v. Morris Shilensky, Arthur Cantor and Charles Wohlstetter, as Executors of the Estate of Billy Rose, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  5. Ballin v. BallinNevada Supreme Court · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API