Legal Opinion

People v. Roofener

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 23, 1981No. 79-446PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Barry

The defendant, Norman T. Roofener, appeals from his conviction for armed robbery following a jury trial. The defendant was sentenced to six years’ imprisonment. On appeal, the only issue raised is whether the defendant was denied his constitutional right to counsel where the trial court allowed the motion of the defendant’s appointed counsel to withdraw for ethical reasons on the date of the trial and after the jury had been selected, and denied to the defendant the opportunity to have other counsel, thus requiring the defendant to proceed pro se, without first securing a knowing and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Boyd v. DuttonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. People v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. RobertsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  2. People v. KosylaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  3. People v. FinleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. People v. HoustonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. People v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API