Legal Opinion

Harris v. Barham

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 3, 1978No. 7610SC1028PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

For plaintiff to establish liability for malicious prosecution against defendants Mangum and the Bank, he must show that these defendants (1) instituted, procured, or participated in the criminal prosecution against him (2) with malice, (3) without probable cause, and (4) that the criminal proceedings terminated in his favor. Cook v. Lanier, 267 N.C. 166, 147 S.E. 2d 910 (1966); Mooney v. Mull, 216 N.C. 410, 5 S.E. 2d 122 (1939); Byrd, Malicious Prosecution in North Carolina, 47 N.C.L. Rev. 285, 286 (1969). In the present case the defendant appellees, as the parties moving for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Zimmerman v. Hogg & Allen, Professional Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Cook v. LanierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Mooney v. . MullSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. Charles Stores Co. Inc. v. O'QuinnCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pokorny v. First Federal Sav. & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. Williams v. Kuppenheimer Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Becker v. PierceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. Shillington v. K-Mart Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  5. Nguyen v. Burgerbusters, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API