Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Desert Properties Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 28, 1939No. 9076PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS', Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of California, Central Division, dismissing plaintiffs’ amended bill of complaint as not containing allegations raising a Federal question.

The bill contains allegations that the action arises under the laws of the United States, Title XXXII, Chapter 6, section 2318 et seq., Revised Statutes of the United States, known generally as the United States Mining Laws, 30 U.S.C.A. § 21 et seq.; that pursuant to said laws plaintiffs duly made and located and filed for record in…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Taylor v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Hopkins v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Castro v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Pixley v. HugginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States v. James R. CosonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  2. Seeley v. SeymourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. Helene P. Pierre v. Frank M. Jordan, Secretary of State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  4. Barnhart v. Western Maryland Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
  5. Schatte v. International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees & Moving Picture Operators of United States & CanadaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1947

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API