Stanfield v. Mahon
Oregon Supreme Court
From Harney: Dalton Biggs, Judge. In Bane. Statement Per Curiam. This action of replevin by R. N. Stanfield against James Mahon was tried and on the eleventh day of April, 1916, a finding was made as follows: “We, the jury impaneled and sworn to try the above-entitled case, find for the defendant, and that defendant was entitled at the commencement of this action to the immediate possession of the 147 head of sheep mentioned in the complaint as security for the payment of…
Read the full summary
From Harney: Dalton Biggs, Judge. In Bane. Statement Per Curiam. This action of replevin by R. N. Stanfield against James Mahon was tried and on the eleventh day of April, 1916, a finding was made as follows: “We, the jury impaneled and sworn to try the above-entitled case, find for the defendant, and that defendant was entitled at the commencement of this action to the immediate possession of the 147 head of sheep mentioned in the complaint as security for the payment of the amount of damage done to defendant’s land described in the answer and also for the reasonable care of said sheep while…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Pee Cueiam.
Resisting the motion, the plaintiff’s counsel filed an affidavit showing that when the verdict was found a motion was made to set it aside and for a new trial; that this application was taken under advisement by the court and it was tacitly agreed between counsel for the respective parties that no judgment should be entered or execution issued until the motion for a new trial was determined; that by reason thereof the affiant believed the judgment would not be entered until it was decided whether or not a new trial would be granted; that on the twenty-second day of May,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Macartney v. ShipherdOregon Supreme Court · 1911
- Gearin v. Portland Ry. Light & Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1912
- Diamond Roller Mills v. MoodyOregon Supreme Court · 1912
- Barde v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1909
- Hahn v. Astoria National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- McCargar v. MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1916