Legal Opinion

Seeman v. Clearview Dodge Sales, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 15, 1985No. 84-CA-316PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BOUTALL, Judge.

This is a suit for redhibition and for damages. From a judgment maintaining the defendants’ exceptions of prescription and dismissing the plaintiff’s suit, the plaintiff has appealed.

Karl A. Seeman, III purchased a customized Dodge van from Clearview Dodge Sales, Inc. (Clearview) on February 6,1980. He returned the vehicle to Clearview for repairs on several occasions between February 17, 1980 and May, 1980. Thereafter it remained at the dealership. He filed this suit on November 15, 1982. Trial of the exceptions of prescription filed by Clear-view and Chrysler Corporation,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

Douglas v. HaroSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
Standard Motor Car Co. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
Robertson v. Jimmy Walker Chrysler-PlymouthLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
Larry Sweeney and Southland Mobile Homes, Inc., Cross-Appellants v. Vindale Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
Mintz v. Audubon Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Blue v. SchoenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990