Legal Opinion

State, Board of Ethics v. Darby

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided August 24, 2006No. CA 2006-1058PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPainter, J.

L Pursuant to La.R.S. 18:1409 of the Election Code, we have granted expedited consideration to the appeal of the judgment denying the Louisiana State Board of Ethics’ (the “Board”) objection to the candidacy of Jim Darby (“Mr. Darby”) for Sheriff of St. Landry Parish, Louisiana. The Board, in its capacity as the Supervisory Committee on Finance Disclosure, asserted that Mr. Darby should be disqualified as a candidate because he falsely certified on his “Notice of Candidacy” that he did not owe outstanding fines, fees, or penalties pursuant to the Campaign Finance Disclosure Act (“CFDA”),…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Landiak v. RichmondSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
  2. Becker v. DeanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  3. Louisiana State Bd. of Ethics v. GarrettLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Louisiana Board of Ethics v. WilsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Alexander v. MenardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. District Attorney v. DeJohnLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Eames v. SchedlerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Eames v. SchedlerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API