Garcia v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1DissentMaloney, Judge
The majority holds that an autopsy report is admissible through the testimony of a medical examiner who did not prepare the report because (1) medical examiners generally do not have a motive to fabricate the results of such reports, and (2) the office of medical examiner is non-adversarial in nature. Garcia v. State, 868 S.W.2d 337, 341-342 (Tex.Crim.App.1993). I would hold that the subject autopsy report is inadmissible under Rule of Criminal Evidence 803(8)(B), as containing matters observed by other law enforcement personnel because (1) the prose-cutorial worth of an autopsy report turns…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Aguilar v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1993
- Reeves v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Baker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Cruz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.