Legal Opinion · Dissent

Garcia v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided September 22, 1993No. 1095-92Published

1DissentMaloney, Judge

The majority holds that an autopsy report is admissible through the testimony of a medical examiner who did not prepare the report because (1) medical examiners generally do not have a motive to fabricate the results of such reports, and (2) the office of medical examiner is non-adversarial in nature. Garcia v. State, 868 S.W.2d 337, 341-342 (Tex.Crim.App.1993). I would hold that the subject autopsy report is inadmissible under Rule of Criminal Evidence 803(8)(B), as containing matters observed by other law enforcement personnel because (1) the prose-cutorial worth of an autopsy report turns…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. Aguilar v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1993
  3. Reeves v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1937
  4. Baker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
  5. Cruz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API