Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Thornton

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1980No. 79-40PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, Chief Judge:

Appellants, the decedent’s heirs-at-law, contested his purported will on the basis that he lacked testamentary capacity at the time of the will’s execution.1 The trial court, relying on the physician-patient privilege, D.C. Code 1973, § 14-307(a), excluded medical evidence and testimony proffered by appellants, and directed a verdict for the appellees. The issue before us on appeal is whether the trial court erred in excluding the proffered evidence and testimony; more specifically, we must decide in the case of a will contest, who is to be considered the decedent’s “legal…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. New York Mutual Life Insurance v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Thompson v. IshSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
  5. Bruington v. WagonerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sklagen v. Greater Southeast Community HospitalDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1984
  2. Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. In Re Estate of WilsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Young v. Firemen's Insurance Co. of Washington, D.C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API