Legal Opinion
United States v. Rothman
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 30, 1959No. Crim. 15750PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARSH, District Judge.
The defendant, Victor Carlucci, moves the court under Rule 17(c), Fed.R.Crim.P., 18 U.S.C.A., to issue a “subpoena duces tecum directed to Captain Eugene Fontaine of the Pennsylvania State Police * * * to produce any statement or memorandum of any conversation with the defendant appearing as part of the Pennsylvania State Police records.” The motion contains the conclusionary averment that Carlucci “needs said memoranda, reports or statements of said defendant’s conversation made by the said Pennsylvania State Police in order to prepare for trial in this case.” He also…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Bowman Dairy Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. IoziaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- Clyde L. Schaffer and James H. Devenny v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Shores v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. Cuthbertson, Gerald M. Appeal of Cbs Inc., Third Party WitnessCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- United States v. LiddyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- State v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- United States v. FancherDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.