Legal Opinion

Frizzle v. Veach

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 1, 1833PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Ejectment.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Robertson

This is an action of ejectment, in which four points are presented.

First. Is a sheriff’s deed to two persons, for land sold by him, under execution, to one of them, as the nominal put chaser, effectual to pass the legal title to both ?

Second. Is land which had been granted by the commonwealth to the “ heirs ” of the person in whose name it had been entered and surveyed prior to his death, subject to sale under an execution against the estate which-had descended to the heirs ?

Third. Have the purchasers of such land, under such an execution, a right, after they had obtained-the sheriff’s deed…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Splahn v. GillespieIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Stevens v. . HauserNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  3. Hanna v. RenfroMississippi Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Semple v. Bank of British ColumbiaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1878
  5. Dubois v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1835

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API