Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Hilburn v. Staeden

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 18, 2001No. SC 83455PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHEN N. LIMBAUGH, JR., Chief Justice.

The Attorney General, as intervenor, appeals an “Order” of the circuit court setting aside a “Judgment and Order” for child support entered by an administrative hearing officer of the Division of Child Support Enforcement (DCSE). The circuit court, relying on Slay v. Slay, 965 S.W.2d 845 (Mo. banc 1998), and Fowler v. Fowler, 984 S.W.2d 508 (Mo. banc 1999), held that section 454.490, RSMo 2000, is unconstitutional because it allows such administrative orders to be entered with “all the force, effect, and attributes of a docketed order or decree of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gibson v. BrewerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  2. Committee for Educational Equality v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  3. Boley v. KnowlesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  4. State Ex Rel. K-Mart Corp. v. HolligerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  5. Marriage of Slay v. SlaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Buemi v. KerckhoffSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  2. State Ex Rel. Henley v. BickelSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  3. State Ex Rel. Hilburn v. StaedenSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  4. Bone v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  5. Flower Valley, LLC, 12667 New Valley, LLC, John C. Crocker, NOLOB, LLC, Keeven Development, LLC, Dunwood Development Co., French Quarter, LLC, Glidepath, LLC v. Jake Zimmerman, Assessor, St. Louis County, MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API