Legal Opinion

City of Somerset v. Hart

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1977PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUKOWSKY, Justice.

This is an appeal by the Hospital and its alter ego, the City, from their share of a $28,144.38 malpractice judgment in favor of Hart. The verdict of the jury apportioned the recovery forty percent or $11,257.75 against the operating surgeon and sixty percent or $16,886.63 against the Hospital and the City. The surgeon has paid his share and gone forth rejoicing.

In July of 1970 Hart was afflicted with a kidney stone. His family physician referred him to a surgeon for further treatment. Surgery was indicated and Hart was admitted to the Hospital. The stone was located in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. TONSIC Et Vir. v. WagnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Cavero v. Franklin General Benevolent SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Dickerson v. American Sugar Refining Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
  4. Stewart v. ManassesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  5. Martin v. PERTH AMBOY GENERAL HOSPITALNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Donald Phillips v. Shastine Tangilag, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  2. Kolakowski v. VorisIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Volb v. G.E. Capital Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  4. Vargo v. SauerMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Greening v. School District of MillardNebraska Supreme Court · 1986

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API