Legal Opinion

State v. Dills

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 9, 1974No. 73-5368PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTanzer, J.

The state appeals from an order suppressing as evidence some amphetamines found during a search of the defendant. The trial court found that the seizure was violative of the rule of State v. Elkins, 245 Or 279, 422 P2d 250 (1966), in that the officer did not have probable cause to believe the seized material to be contraband.

The material facts are not in dispute. The defendant was stopped in traffic and arrested pursuant to an outstanding warrant. In the course of a search pursuant to arrest, the officers found a vial of pills. Based upon his training and experience, the officer testified, he…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. ElkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. State v. FloranceOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. State v. KeithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  4. State v. CortezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  5. State v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. GibbonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  2. State v. GibbonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API