Legal Opinion

Sweeney v. Frew

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 31, 1945PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.

The plaintiff recovered a judgment against the defendant Frew for personal injuries sustained by him on account of the operation of a motor vehicle which Frew owned. He brings this bill under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 175, § 113, and c. 214, § 3 (10), to reach and apply, in satisfaction of his judgment, the obligation of the defendant insurance company (hereinafter called the company) under a motor vehicle liability policy issued by it to Frew. The bill was taken pro confessa against Frew. From a final decree establishing Frew’s indebtedness for the amount of the judgment with interest and costs…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Lowell Bar Ass'n v. LoebMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Birnbaum v. PamoukisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Miller v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  4. Lunt v. Aetna Life Insurance Co. of HartfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  5. MacBey v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. v. Home InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
  2. Salonen v. PaanenenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  3. Strickland Ex Rel. Steed v. HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Sheehan v. GorianskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  5. Hatridge v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API