Legal Opinion
Hall v. Orthopedic Clinic
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 23, 1968No. 41290PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HODGES, Justice.
Plaintiff in error, Ruth Hall, instituted this action abainst the defendants in error, Orthopedic Clinic, a co-partnership, and one of the partners individually, Frank A. Stuart, M.D., to recover damages for a personal injury that allegedly resulted from the negligence of defendant Stuart. Before trial, Dr. Stuart died and the Executor of his Estate, the National Bank of Tulsa, was substituted as party defendant. The parties will be designated as they appeared in the trial court.
Plaintiff, while attempting to step out of a boat, fell and injured her right arm near the elbow.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Petroleum Iron Works Co. v. BullingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Westgate Oil Co. v. McAbeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- First Nat. Bank of Wetumka v. NolenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Glens Falls Insurance Company v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Nye v. CoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Boyanton v. ReifSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Boyanton v. ReifSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990