Pure Oil Co. v. Minnesota
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR Tp THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. The case is stated in the opinion..
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clarke
In this case the State of Minnesota sued the plaintiff in error, an extensive dealer in oils, to recover fees, which were charged for the inspection of oils and gasoline,, between February 1, 1913, and April 25, 1915. The judgment of the State Supreme Court affirming that of the trial court in favor of the State is before us for review on writ of error.
The inspection involved was provided for by chapter 502 _of the General Laws 'of the State of Minnesota for the year 1909, the title of which is: "An Act relating to the inspection of petroleum products, t!he appointment of chief inspector of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Savage v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. McCueSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Patterson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Patapsco Guano Co. v. North Carolina Board of AgricultureSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Asbell v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- South Carolina State Highway Department v. Barnwell Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Davis v. Department of Labor and Industries of Wash.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- SC Hwy. Dept. v. Barnwell Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Dewell v. LawsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- Texas Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.