Legal Opinion

Sloan v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 25, 1988No. 1161-87PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Per curiam

Appellant was convicted by a jury of the offense of possession of a controlled substance, to-wit: methamphetamine, weighing at least 400 grams aggregate weight, including adulterants and dilutants. Article 4476-15, Section 4.04(d)(2), V.A.C.S. The trial court assessed punishment.at confinement for 45 years. The First Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction in a published opinion. Sloan v. State, 738 S.W.2d 290 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st] 1987, pet. granted).

Appellant’s petition for discretionary review was granted to determine whether the…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Engelking v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. McGlothlin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  3. Sloan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987

4Cited by16 opinions

  1. Reeves v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Cawthon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. Blackmon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1990
  4. State v. Engelking, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1989
  5. Isaacs v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API