Legal Opinion
United States v. Mendoza-Maisonet
United States District Court
Decided February 9, 2018No. Criminal No. 16–194 (FAB)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
BESOSA, District Judge.
*339Before the Court is defendant Josué Mendoza-Maisonet ("Mendoza")'s post-trial motion for judgment of acquittal pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 29 (" Rule 29"). (Docket No. 250.) For the reasons set forth below, the Rule 29 motion is DENIED .
I. Background
The Court summarizes the key facts in the light most favorable to the jury's verdict and in a manner consistent with the trial record. United States v. Valerio, 676 F.3d 237, 240 (1st Cir. 2012) ; United States v. Polanco, 634 F.3d 39, 40 (1st Cir. 2011).
On March 24, 2016, Puerto Rico Police Department…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Burrage v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- United States v. LaraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- United States v. BergodereCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- United States v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Santiago-MendezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Harold Esquilin-Montanez [2]United States District Court · 2018